MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37339145

Polish palaeontological research in the Arctic

2009· article· en· W37339145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdam Mickiewicz University Repository (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchipelagoArcticThe arcticGeographyOceanographyGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic is a vast area comprising the northernmost continental regions of the Earth: Nova Zemlya, Svalbard, Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Because of their relatively easy accessibility, they are among the most frequently visited places of this region, with the Svalbard Archipelago being the most intensively used for scienti fi c purposes and the best-studied one among them. Poland belongs to the most active states conducting research in this area. The history of our studies there goes back to 1932, when three Poles, Czeslaw Cent-kiewicz, Stanislaw Siedlecki and Wladyslaw Łysakowski, organised the fi rst Polish expe-dition to the North, combined with wintering on Bear Island (Bjornoya). By 1939, three more expeditions had been made. The war and the next decade have been the only longer break in our exploration history of this region, but from then on large expeditions to polar areas have been organised on an almost yearly basis.The post-war scientifi c activity of Polish re-searchers on Spitsbergen (the largest island of Svalbard) started in the years 1957–1958 with an expedition organised by the International Geophysical Year Commission; 130 partici-pants represented 23 scientifi c disciplines. It was then that K. Birkenmajer rendered serv-ices for palaeontology by collecting his fi rst specimens, among others of corals (handed over to J. Fedorowski for systematisation) and lampshells (brachiopods), which S. Czarniecki offered to systematise. In the course of the next expeditions, lasting until 1962, meteorologi-cal, geodetic-astronomical and geomagnetic measurements were augmented with basic palaeontological studies. The effect of these ex-peditions was impressive, since they resulted in about 400 publications, including the fi rst Polish work on fossil Arctic organisms. They were lampshells, which were used to establish a stratigraphy for the marine Carboniferous and Permian deposits in Hornsund (Birkenma-jer & Czarniecki, 1960), later partly questioned (Birkenmajer, 1964; Fedorowski, 1965; Water-house, 1970). Intensive studies on Spitsbergen were launched in the late 1950s and they were con-tinued until the 1960s and 1970s; they yielded the largest proportion of palaeontological works. The knowledge of most of the fossil fau-na of the Arctic was largely due to the collect-ing passion of the participants of expeditions organised to the Hornsund area (Fig. 1) in the years 1958–1962. K. Birkenmajer then gathered mainly corals from Treskelen, and S.K. Czarni-ecki collected lampshells and bryozoans from the Kapp Starostin Formation as well as corals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it