Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction L.Fuller PART I: ABORIGINAL/INDIGENOUS EXPERIENCES Australia: Remote Beginnings, Metropolitan Developments: Community and Indigenous Television in Australia E.Rennie Canada: (Re)Colouring the Public Broadcasting System in Canada: A Case Study of the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network L.Roth Latin America: Call Me Impure: Myths and Paradigms of Participatory Communication, With a Focus on Latin America A.Dagron Native Americans: Media as Constructor of Ethnic Minority Identity: A Native American Case Study R.Levo-Henriksson PART II: CURRENT CASE STUDIES Bangladesh: Use of TV by Farmers in Bangladesh M.Kashem & M.Hossain Ghana: Implications of Globalization for Community Broadcasting in Ghana K.Ansu-Kyeremeh India: Community Radio in India: Some Critical Issues S.Chaudhary & K.Bansal Ireland: Digital Daze: Community TV in Ireland and the Broadcasting Act of 2001 M.Gillan Israel: Voz Populi or Lonely Voices in the Wasteland of the Ionosphere: Community Television and Its Future - The Israeli Case H.Nossek Singapore: Top-Down Community Media: A Participant Observation from Singapore L.Fuller Turkey: A Civic Adventure in Turkey: Creation and Evolution of TOSAM and the 'Radio Democracy' Project D.Ergil PART III: VIRTUAL COMMUNITY VISIONS Cyberdating: The Architecture of Cyberdating: Personal Advertisement Photography and the Unworking of Community E.Freedman The Netherlands, The People's Communication Charter: Global Communication and People's Rights C.Hamelink Living Tolerance: Public Access Producers and the Practices of 'Free Speech' J.Higgins Theories of Community Media: Multi-theoretical Approaches to Community Media: Capturing Specificity and Diversity N.Carpentier Virtual Communities: Conceptualizing Community: Implications for Policymaking in a Cyberage C.Stewart & M.Pileggi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it