MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reading Australia from Distant Shores

2014· article· en· W387232347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Wawrzinek

Bibliographic record

VenueAntipodes · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)HistoryGeographyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Summer of 2002, I traveled to Paris in order to present a paper on Croatian-Australian poet Morgan Yasbincek and French-Canadian poet Nicole Brossard. I was then a doctoral candidate at the University of Melbourne, where I was writing on aesthetics in the contemporary Australian and Canadian text. One of my supervisors, who was originally from Perth and had published several novels with Fremantle Arts Centre Press, had given me a review copy of Yasbincek's prose novel entitled liv, also published with FACP. I was absorbed by this novel, for the sensuality of its prose, the critical astuteness of its philosophical ideas, and for the power and beauty of a narrative dealing with three generations of women, the trauma of escaping Tito's dictatorship, the dislocation of moving to a new country, and the feeling, two generations later, of being caught in-between cultures, languages, and historical epochs. Yet in Paris it seemed no one had ever heard of Morgan Yasbincek, let alone the novel liv. The other doctoral candidates I met who were working in Australian Studies were almost unanimously working on Patrick White. This was because, so they told me, it was impossible to get anything else in France. Three years later, when I was living in Paris on a research grant, I experienced the paucity of quality Australian literature for myself. Elaine Lewis had closed The Australian Bookshop on the LeftBank in the year 2000, and whilst other well-known English-language bookshops such as Shakespeare and Company, the San Francisco Bookshop, and the Abbey Bookshop were still there, the examples of Australian literature I could find were often mainstream texts from big publishers.In Paris, however, I was doing my own research and I didn't have to teach, develop course outlines, or set texts for student reading. When I moved to Berlin in 2006 to take up a post-doc in Australian Studies, the situation was quite different. Here I was confronted with the difficulty of compiling reading lists of texts by new Australian authors who I thought were engaging with language and culture in exciting, and often very experimental, ways; writers who compel us to think differently about Australia and the world. In Melbourne, as a doctoral candidate, I was heavily involved with the emerging writer's scene of young poets and novelists who would read their work at casual pub events, literary evenings and other informal gatherings. I spent some time editing the postgraduate literary journal entitled antiTHESIS and was involved in the formation of the spoken-word event series known as animal. I knew there was an exciting world of contemporary Australian writing out there and I wanted to share my passion for it with my students in Berlin. In hindsight perhaps I was a little naive to think that I could deliver what I considered to be some of the best of contemporary Australian writing to students on the other side of the world; although to be fair, one would think that this wouldn't be such a problem in a cultural capital such as Berlin-a city renowned for its vibrant experimental arts scene.The course I developed was titled Writing the Australian Imaginary. It aimed to examine different ways of imagining the Australian nation and what it meant to be Australian. I only set three titles: Kim Scott's Benang (FACP); Morgan Yasbincek's liv (FACP); and Brian Castro's Shanghai Dancing (Giramondo). From my experience with the Yasbincek title in an earlier aesthetics course, I knew the students would have difficulty finding the books. I therefore listed with the course description links to two Australian art-house bookshops, both of which offered online ordering systems, albeit somewhat user unfriendly for international customers. None of the students in this course chose to order with the Australian bookshops. Some went to Saint George's Bookshop in Prenzlauerberg (widely considered the best English-language bookshop in Berlin together with the large multi-level bookshop on Friedrichstrasse called Dussmann) but were dismayed to discover that the shop assistants had never heard of any of the authors and it would take six to eight weeks to get the title in. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntipodesSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207