Lenguas en contacto: abriendo paso a las modificaciones lingüísticas del judeo-español en Turquía en el siglo XX.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hoy más que nunca la economía mundial exige el contacto e intercambio y el aislamiento geográfico y lingüístico se vuelven conceptos en peligro de extinción. Los mundos y las lenguas entran en contacto y son sujetos de transformaciones: dejan surgir nuevas formas de vivir, percibir y de expresarse. Al tema de nuevas formas de expresarse pertenece la evolución lingüística de lenguas en contacto y no resultará sorprendente que este estudio se enfocará en la lengua judeo-española en Turquía por lo espectacular que es su mantenimiento en forma intacta por unos 400 años y luego por abrirse a la adopción de varios elementos de las lenguas vecinas, en sólo un siglo. En este estudio presentaremos las particularidades del súbito desarrollo de esta lengua en función de las diversas actitudes sociales que surgieron en el siglo XX en Turquía. El estudio explicará las condiciones sociales de la conservación de la lengua adoptada en la península Ibérica, señalará las circunstancias que provocaron la inestabilidad de su status quo, y, por último, presentará ejemplos de las prácticas sociales últimamente descubiertas que puedan impactar positivamente la lucha por la supervivencia de esta lengua. Today more than ever the global economy demands contact and exchange in such a way that the geographic and linguistic isolation become concepts on the verge of extinction. The worlds and their languages come into contact and are subject to alterations as new ways of life, perception and expression evolve. To the subject of new forms of expression belongs the evolution of the languages in contact and it will not be surprising that this study will focus on Judeo-Spanish in Turkey considering its spectacular conservation in the original form for nearly 400 years, and then because of its opening to various elements of the neighbouring languages in the last century. In this study, we will present the particularities of the sudden development of this language in function of the diverse social attitudes which emerged in 20th century Turkey. The study will explain the social conditions that lead to the conservation of the language adopted in the Iberian Peninsula, will point out the circumstances which provoked the instability of its status quo, and, finally, it will present examples of lately discovered social practices which may impact positively the struggle for survival of this language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".