MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200100520 · doi:10.1364/optica.428727

Optical signal denoising through temporal passive amplification

2021· article· en· W4200100520 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Crockett, Luis Romero Cortés, Reza Maram, José Azaña

Bibliographic record

VenueOptica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Noise reductionComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitigating the stochastic noise introduced during the generation, transmission, and detection of temporal optical waveforms remains a significant challenge across many applications, including radio-frequency photonics, light-based telecommunications, spectroscopy, etc. The problem is particularly difficult for the weak-intensity signals often found in practice. Active amplification worsens the signal-to-noise ratio, whereas noise mitigation based on optical bandpass filtering attenuates further the waveform of interest. Additionally, current optical filtering approaches are not optimal for signal bandwidths narrower than just a few GHz. We propose a versatile concept for simultaneous amplification and noise mitigation of temporal waveforms, here successfully demonstrated on optical signals with bandwidths spanning several orders of magnitude, from the kHz to GHz scale. The concept is based on lossless temporal sampling of the incoming coherent waveform through Talbot processing. By reaching high gain factors ( >100 ), we show the recovery of ultra-weak optical signals, with power levels below the detector threshold, additionally buried under a much stronger noise background. The method is inherently self-tracking, a capability demonstrated by simultaneously denoising four data signals in a dense wavelength division multiplexing scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpticaSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207