MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200146156 · doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100077

Investigation of climate change impacts on long-term care facility occupants

2021· article· en· W4200146156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCity and Environment Interactions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthProvincial Health Services AuthorityWestern University
FundersBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaMitacsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsClimate changeExtreme weatherEnvironmental healthFlooding (psychology)Vulnerability (computing)MedicineGeographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is causing alterations to the geophysical system; rising global temperatures are causing extreme heat events, wildfires, and changes in infectious agents; sea-level rise and extreme precipitation events are increasing the frequency and intensity of flood events. These climate change impacts have a negative effect on human health, specifically on the most vulnerable populations. Vulnerability is the idea of susceptibility to damage or harm; with respect to climate change, it is a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. This case study explores the exposure and sensitivity of long-term care facility occupants in British Columbia (B.C.), Canada, because of the high proportion of long-term care residents that are sensitive to climate change. The climate change impacts under review were identified as those with the greatest risk to B.C., the potential to result in significant consequences, as well as current events and prevalence in the region over the past decade. The health effects of these primary climate change impacts were identified through a literature review. Both age and health condition are factors of sensitivity, in B.C. 97% of long-term care facility occupants have chronic diseases (including cardiovascular, endocrine, musculoskeletal, neurological, pulmonary, psychiatric, respiratory, and sensory diseases), and 95% are over the age of 65. A number of chronic diseases (e.g. hypertension and dementia) have been identified that are likely to be exacerbated because of climate change, specifically the four most significant and relevant climate change impacts in B.C.: extreme heat, flooding, changes in infectious agents, and wildfires. In this paper, the proportions of long-term care facility occupants in B.C. with these chronic diseases have been quantified, highlighting the importance of building the adaptive capacity of these populations to decrease their vulnerability. Various building design solutions were explored, confirming the relationship identified in past studies between the built environment, climate change, and occupant health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it