MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200311977 · doi:10.1042/bio_2021_189

Tales from the lab

2021· article· en· W4200311977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Biochemist · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDreamMedia studiesSociologyHistoryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As we grow up, the first way many of us meet science is as a series of amazing facts and figures. Yet, in reality, those facts and figures are the smallest part of what makes science what it is.The people who drive science are unique and have their own stories and tales of what made them fall in love with research. Those stories describe the events that made them who they are.When we came up with the idea for Tales From The Lab, we wanted to share those stories and connect with new audiences to show that science isn’t just the work of some old, very dead, men. In place of stereotypes, we wanted to show that science is for everyone. We aimed to provide an opportunity for people to share their stories in their own words.Over the last year, with funding from the Biochemical Society, Tales From The Lab has captured ten stories from scientists at different career levels. Some of these stories take the biggest of pictures and tell us the story of their life journey. Others describe the specific moment they learnt the singular importance of a vital fact. We have stories from scientists telling the precise moments in their childhoods that made them who they are, and those who told of how their childhood dream turned out to be the last thing they wanted to do.Here is the story from Dr Leanna Smith, University of Toronto. Leanna describes how a perilous journey into higher education has, decades later, inspired contributions to STEM outreach and mentorship initiatives.Only 3 or 4 minutes remained. Sitting alone at home, I feverishly checked and re-rechecked my UCAS personal statement for spelling errors, grammatical errors…any kind of error that could suggest a lack of serious interest or competence. How did I get into this ridiculous situation? How could I be so incredibly unprepared?For decades I had enthusiastically answered questions (albeit, rarely correctly) in class, attending weekend outreach events at the local university, grasping at every extracurricular STEM opportunity with both hands, going above and beyond to satisfy my thirst for scientific knowledge. Now, I was sitting here about to throw it all away through lack of preparation, research and understanding.Tick. Tick. Tick.Feelings of regret, frustration and hesitance washed over me again and again. I started to question myself, did I approach this in the completely wrong way? Is there some kind of secret hack or fool-proof method to impress the university admissions office? Do my friends and peers know something I don’t?Tick. Tick. Tick. 17:58. Two minutes till the deadline. I give it one last check.The words started blurring across the computer monitor. Words merging into sentences merging into paragraphs merging into headings merging into subheadings. 17:59. Seconds left; Now or never, I finally click submit. There! Done it! Not relief or triumph, but dread. Just a sinking feeling…12 months later, Autumn 2009. To my great relief and in spite of these shortcomings, I had been offered a university place and was studying for a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry. I’m hunkering down in the library’s downstairs cafeteria between lectures. Hobbling together a lab report due for submission later in the week whilst sipping a thermos of scalding hot green tea. A soft, faint hum from the vending machines echoed across the library ground floor. Students bustled in and out between rooms, enthusiastically discussing plans for the weekend. Outside, towering streetlights flooded pockets of space with intense, artificial light whilst moths and gnats danced chaotically overhead.“What’s this?” Something caught the corner of my eye. Pamphlets lay strewn haphazardly across the tables, barely acknowledged by those passing by. “Outreach and Widening Participation” – “Flexible, Part-Time Opportunities”. The flyer catches my interest, ‘this looks interesting’, I thought. A great way to earn some extra money for the summer break, perhaps? Maybe an opportunity to develop transferable skills beyond my degree programme whilst giving back to the local community? I stashed the leaflet into the bottom of my backpack and half-sprinted out of the library towards the Life Sciences block for the afternoon’s lab session.Thanks to the leaflet and advertised outreach opportunity, I found myself spending my Summer as a Student Associate at a local high school. I was tasked with providing extra support within STEM classes, assisting with student access, and help them understand higher education.I sat in a classroom, much like I had when preparing my own UCAS statement, high school students enthusiastically poured over worksheets and notebooks, discussing ideas and solutions to the challenge at hand. Everything was relaxed, the classroom was working well. Then a student enthusiastically chimed in with “I’ve always been interested in a career as a research technician, or maybe a nurse..?” looking at me, the university student, to have something useful to add.Silence. Panic. Dread. Do I respond? What should I say?Although I‘d successfully secured a university place, how could I possibly support young people taking the potentially perilous road to STEM higher education? I’d barely made it through the application process intact. And despite now being at university, I didn’t really understand what higher education was about, it was just something I was doing.“Sounds great”. The only response I could muster.A few seconds of awkward silence followed, before heads dropped down again and we re-engaged the worksheets that lay in front of us. The focus shifted back to the lesson, back to the worksheets and task at hand.That evening, I sat at home, drafting entries into my reflective log for assessment, as required for my participation in the Student Associate scheme.What could I write? How did I meaningfully contribute to their understanding of university applications and access? What could I improve in advance of my next discussion about university education? Questions lingered over and over in my mind. I doubted myself, someone with more knowledge, expertise and success would be better suited to this role, I thought.Five years later I was in the thick of an intensely challenging and all-consuming biochemistry PhD research project. Working late into the night to finish my experiments, before stumbling back to my student accommodation through the streets of Leicester. My head briefly hit the pillow before my alarm pierced abruptly through the dead of morning. A faint summer glow radiates across the summer sky as birds bustle overhead. I head back to the lab where my limbs engage in a frantic, almost ritualistic choreography of pipetting, typing, pushing, pulling, pouring, filtering.In a brief break from the daily grind of lab work I sit down and check my emails. A small glimmer of respite, a palette cleanser for a tedious and tricky experiment ahead. “Mentorship – Opportunities”. The circular detailed a voluntary, online role in assisting high school students with accessing university education and exploring STEM careers. An opportunity to make a difference, perhaps? A chance to finally impart my experience and understanding to help others? A redemption story for my previous less-than-excellent Student Associate position?I go to reply, and flashback. I’m 17 again. Frantically typing a sub-par personal statement, with barely an understanding of university education or STEM degrees or UCAS applications or anything vaguely related. The same feeling again. Not relief or triumph, but dread. A sinking feeling. Or this time, perhaps…an opportunity? I ping back a cautious but enthusiastic reply.Now in July 2021, and I’m sitting in front of my laptop on a balmy, humid summer evening. Employed as a postdoctoral researcher at the local university. My inbox pings with a notification – it’s a new email from my mentee, including a list of enthusiastic questions. “What’s your current profession? How did you decide your degree at university and career path? What challenges did you face? How did you overcome it?” I inhale deeply, closing my eyes briefly. I reflect, flexing my fingers until I hear my knuckles crack. This time, I know exactly what to write. Where to signpost, how to inspire, ways to engage. Words into articulate sentences into clear paragraphs into crisp headings into defined subheadings. 17:59. And submit. There. Done it.You can find more stories on Twitter under the #TalesFromTheLab hash-tag, and on YouTube in the Tales From The Lab playlist.■Link: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8ahVRveq_0RJUcMJCqXmhuvaAytOoYk6QR Code:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it