MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200335911 · doi:10.15407/pmach2021.04.061

Strength and Service Life of a Steam Turbine Stop and Control Valve Body

2021· article· en· W4200335911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepControl valvesSteam turbineMechanicsService lifeTurbineBall valveStructural engineeringBoiler (water heating)Finite element methodMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite materialPhysicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability of operation of steam turbines depends (along with other factors) on the reliable operation of their steam distribution systems, which are based on stop and control valves. This paper considers the strength of the elements of the K-325-23.5 steam turbine valves, in whose bodies, after 30 thousand hours of operation, cracks came to be observed. Previously determined were the nature of gas-dynamic processes in the flow paths of the valves and the temperature state of the valve body in the main stationary modes of operation. To do this, a combined problem of steam flow and thermal conductivity in stop and control valves was solved in a three-dimensional formulation by the finite element method. Different positions of the valve elements were considered taking into account the filter sieve. The assessment of the thermal stress state of the valve body showed that the maximum stresses in different operating modes do not exceed the yield strength. Therefore, the assessment of the creep of the valve body material is important to determine the valve body damage and service life. Modeling the creep of the stop and control valves of the turbine was performed on the basis of three-dimensional models, using the theory of hardening, with the components of unstable and steady creep strains taken into account. The creep was determined at the maximum power of the turbine for all the stationary operating modes. The maximum calculated values of creep strains are concentrated in the valve body branch pipes before the control valves and in the steam inlet chamber, where in practice fatigue defects are observed. However, even for 300 thousand hours of operation of the turbine (with a conditional maximum power) in stationary modes, creep strains do not exceed admissible values. The damage and service life of the valve bodies were assessed by two methods developed at A. Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems of the NAS of Ukraine (2011), and I. Polzunov Scientific and Design Association on Research and Design of Power Equipment. (NPO CKTI) – 1986. The results of assessing the damage and the turbine valve body wear from the effects of cyclic loading and creep of the turbine in stationary modes for 40, 200 and 300 thousand hours show that the thermal conditions of the body in the steam inlet chamber are not violated (without taking into account possible body defects after manufacture). The damage in valve body branch pipes after 300 thousand hours of operation exceeds the admissible value, with account taken of the safety margin. At the same time, the damage from creep in stationary operating modes is about 70% of the total damage. The maximum values of damage are observed in the areas of the body where there are defects during the operation of the turbine steam distribution system. The difference between the results of both methods in relation to their average value is ~20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it