MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200411495 · doi:10.1002/nme.6901

An extended finite element method with polygonal enrichment shape functions for crack propagation and stiff interfaceproblems

2021· article· en· W4200411495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersUniversity of Sydney
KeywordsFinite element methodTraction (geology)Structural engineeringDisplacement (psychology)StiffnessExtended finite element methodFracture mechanicsRepresentation (politics)Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Laplace transformMathematical analysisMathematicsGeometryEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The extended/generalized finite element method has proven significant efficiency for handling crack propagation and internal boundaries. In certain conditions, however, one of the major drawbacks relates to the representation of unrealistic traction oscillations, particularly in stiff interfaces. To the authors' best knowledge, the few remedies found in the literature depend on the type of underlying finite element, which in some aspects limits general applications. Since one of the major sources of oscillations is created by couplings within standard shape functions for certain crack arrangements, it is herein proposed a novel approach based on enrichment Laplace shape functions directly adapted to the underlying geometry of split subdomains. By doing so, all sources of oscillations are effectively removed, while enriched degrees of freedom are defined exclusively on one side of the domain. The performance is studied using both element and structural examples with highly stiff cracks. More importantly, further assessment in more complex crack propagation problems, including mixed‐mode fracture of concrete beams and a peel test, shows excellent agreement with experimental/numerical data in terms of load‐displacement curves and traction profiles. Results are shown to be objective with respect to the mesh for stiffness values virtually representing infinitely stiff interfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it