MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200436674 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041050

Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Double Pulsar

2021· article· en· W4200436674 on OpenAlexafffund
I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, Norbert Wex, Adam T. Deller, W. A. Coles, Masooma Ali, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, I. Cognard, Thibault Damour, G. Desvignes, R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, S. Grondin, L. Guillemot, G. Hobbs, G. H. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, D. R. Lorimer, A. G. Lyne, James W. McKee, M. A. McLaughlin, L. Münch, Benetge B. P. Perera, Nihan S. Pol, Andrea Possenti, John Sarkissian, B. W. Stappers, G. Theureau

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaASTRONMax-Planck-GesellschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSeventh Framework ProgrammeObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAssociated UniversitiesH2020 European Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPulsarNeutron starBinary pulsarRelativistic quantum chemistryGeneral relativityGravitational waveOrbit (dynamics)Moment of inertiaAstrophysicsEquation of stateOrbital periodGravitationSpin (aerodynamics)Classical mechanicsMillisecond pulsarStarsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not.The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations252
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review X→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→