Improved Detection of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at Chest CT Using the Mean Curvature of Isophotes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if the mean curvature of isophotes (MCI), a standard computer vision technique, can be used to improve detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at chest CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, chest CT scans were obtained in 243 patients with COPD and 31 controls (among all 274: 151 women [mean age, 70 years; range, 44-90 years] and 123 men [mean age, 71 years; range, 29-90 years]) from two community practices between 2006 and 2019. A convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was trained on either CT images or CT images transformed through the MCI algorithm. Separately, a linear classification based on a single feature derived from the MCI computation (called hMCI1) was also evaluated. All three models were evaluated with cross-validation, using precision-macro and recall-macro metrics, that is, the mean of per-class precision and recall values, respectively (the latter being equivalent to balanced accuracy). RESULTS: Linear classification based on hMCI1 resulted in a higher recall-macro relative to the CNN trained and applied on CT images (0.85 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.86] vs 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.79]) but with a similar reduction in precision-macro (0.66 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.67] vs 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.79]). The CNN model trained and applied on MCI-transformed images had a higher recall-macro (0.85 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.87] vs 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.79]) and precision-macro (0.85 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.87] vs 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.79]) relative to the CNN trained and applied on CT images. CONCLUSION: See also the invited commentary by Vannier in this issue.© RSNA, 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it