MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200509991 · doi:10.1103/physreve.104.064113

Brownian dynamics simulations for the narrow escape problem in the unit sphere

2021· article· en· W4200509991 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIndian Institute of Technology GandhinagarUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBrownian motionIsotropyBrownian dynamicsDomain (mathematical analysis)Boundary value problemBoundary (topology)Poisson distributionFirst-hitting-time modelWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The narrow escape problem is a first-passage problem that concerns the calculation of the time needed for a Brownian particle to leave a domain with localized absorbing boundary traps, such that the measure of these traps is asymptotically small compared to the domain size. A common model for the mean first-passage time (MFPT) as a function of particle's starting location in a given domain with constant diffusivity is given by a Poisson partial differential equation subject to mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions. The primary objective of this work is to perform direct numerical simulations of multiple particles undergoing Brownian motion in a three-dimensional spherical domain with boundary traps, compute MFPT values by averaging Brownian escape times, and compare these with explicit asymptotic results obtained previously by approximate solution of the Poisson problem. A close agreement of MFPT values is observed already at 10^{4} particle runs from a single starting point, providing a computational validation of the Poisson equation-based continuum model. Direct Brownian dynamics simulations are also used to study additional features of particle dynamics in narrow escape problems that cannot be captured in a continuum approach, such as average times spent by particles in a thin layer near the domain boundary, and effects of isotropic vs anisotropic near-boundary diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicDiffusion and Search DynamicsFrench-language works237,207