MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Masa: AI-Adaptive Mobile App for Sustainable Agriculture

2021· article· en· W4200566918 on OpenAlexaff
Ruth Ogubuike, Ashfaq Adib, Rita Orji

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicICT in Developing Communities
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureSustainabilityBusinessProduct (mathematics)Resource (disambiguation)Sustainable agricultureMarketingComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile applications have made significant positive contributions to our daily lives in recent years. They have greatly improved practices in critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and agriculture etc. The agricultural sector is under pressure to meet the ever-increasing food demand while needing to deal with lack of agricultural resources (such as water and soil) and climate change issues. There is also a need to figure out how to attract and involve young people in agriculture in order to replace aging farmers. These issues necessitate the development of new, sustainable agricultural solutions. This is the demand that Masa app is attempting to meet. This paper presents the design and implementation of an AI-adaptive mobile app for sustainable agriculture. The app is divided into two sections: the market section which creates a platform where buyers are able to connect with the farmers directly and the resource center section where the power of AI is used to give guidance to the farmers. It also has learning resources where new entrants into the Agric sector can have first-hand walk-through guides in the Agric field containing all the information they need to venture into farming any product of choice. This will help mitigate some of the challenges faced by people who are new or venturing into the agricultural sector thereby encouraging more people to enter agriculture hence its sustainability. Initial feedback on the application from researchers of human-computer interaction domain show the application's promise in closing the gap in farming knowledge among general people while highlighting some limitations and suggestion that can be considered for improving the application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)Same topicICT in Developing CommunitiesFrench-language works237,207