MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205132464 · doi:10.1353/sfs.2021.0042

Ray Bradbury, “Ray Bradbury,” and “RAY BRADBURY”

2021· article· en· W4205132464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joe Sutliff Sanders

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Fiction Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolloBiographyArt historyPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

367 BOOKS IN REVIEW misunderstandings but Clarke concludes that it has ultimately benefitted both parties, since the quest for truth and the desire to answer questions lie at the heart of both. There are some absences in the book, such as the sf output of Canadian writer and devout Catholic Derwin Mak or Emmanuel Pic’s La Station solitaire [The Solitary Station, 2012], about a priest abducted by aliens (Pic is a priest and psychologist), but Clarke is to be congratulated for delving into the relatively unexplored territory of sf and Catholicism and furnishing a readable and instructive volume that should interest anyone interested in the spiritual and philosophical questions evoked by sf.—Paul Scott, University of Kansas Ray Bradbury, “Ray Bradbury,” and “RAY BRADBURY.” Jonathan R. Eller. Bradbury Beyond Apollo. U of Illinois P, 2020. xii+347 pp. $40 hc. This volume completes the biography that began with Becoming Ray Bradbury (2013) and continued with Ray Bradbury Unbound (2014). It covers the period between 1971 and 2012, from the triumph of the Apollo space program to Bradbury’s death. Based on documentary research, contacts with the people who have authoritative information about major aspects of Bradbury’s career, and Eller’s many conversations with Bradbury himself, it is certain to be our generation’s definitive life of Bradbury. That said, note that the book is focused on Bradbury’s public life; family relations and personal issues are mentioned but not explored. Instead, Eller makes the justifiable decision to share as much information as he can about Bradbury’s last years as a beloved writer and public figure. Disappointment shadows discussion of that first subject. Early in his career, when he was a young, uncertain writer with a wealth of hopes and fears to work through, Bradbury was driven to produce a cascade of stories that stretched the range of sf. Readers of Astounding might not exactly have welcomed subversive stories such as “Mars is Heaven!” (first published in Planet Stories, of all places, in 1948), but they could not deny their emotional power. By the time of Bradbury Beyond Apolllo, Bradbury was a much older writer, with his uncertainties comfortably subdued. In addition, he had chosen to direct most of his creative energy into dramatic performances, writing stage and screen plays. Consequently, as Eller remarks, “it remained to be seen how he could break out of the growing perception among his friends and publishers that his storytelling powers were now feeding lesser works in other genres” (50). His earlier books continued to sell steadily. Nevertheless, although The Halloween Tree was popular as a book (1972) and an animated television film (1993) and The Ray Bradbury Theater ran on television for four years (198586 ,1988-92), Bradbury’s last years are notable for story collections that mixed earlier works with more recent, less substantial pieces; for volumes of amiable, rather self-indulgent poetry; and for the trio of surrealist, autobiographical mystery novels, beginning with Death is a Lonely Business (1985), in which a Young Writer must come to terms with his fears and desires. Readers can find pleasures in these books, but as Eller describes the contents of one mingled collection, the older stories “served to fill the gaps 368 SCIENCE FICTION STUDIES, VOLUME 48 (2021) in Bradbury’s storytelling history from a time when he was at the top of his game” (268). Much of Bradbury Beyond Apollo, however, is about the ripples of positive influence from those early stories. When Bradbury was at the top of his game, he helped show other writers that emotion was not simply an enemy of rational thought that must be subdued (as it appears to be in in Heinlein’s “The Roads Must Roll” [Astounding 1940], for example). Rather, it is a vital force in human life, sometimes dangerous but sometimes nourishing. He helped encourage the writing of a larger, deeper sf. Among his readers, Bradbury did not offer detailed arguments in favor of space exploration but rather encouraged a childlike yearning for more. But the voracious readers of those early stories did not need a technological argument; the magazine stories that were assembled into The Martian Chronicles (1950), for example, infected...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Fiction StudiesSame topicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207