MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LA REVISORÍA FISCAL Y LA AUDITORÍA EN COLOMBIA FRENTE A LAS NUEVAS EXIGENCIAS E IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE LAS NIIF

2021· article· en· W4205164967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePensamiento Republicano · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecreeAuditInternational Financial Reporting StandardsAccountingBusinessPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the implementation of international financial reporting standards (IFRS), a number of effects have been developed under the regulatory framework in the exercise of the functions of fiscal review and auditing, these tasks were governed by Decree 2649 and international audit standards, which had some modifications when Decree 0302 of 2015 was implemented. This process of convergence with IFRS in Co- lombia and around the world in recent years has generated various reactions between the different sectors, due to the changes that are being applied in the financial part and the indicators that show the reasonable situation of companies. Taking into account the above, it will analyze and determine what are the different effects caused by the implementation of IFRS, in the exercise of the Fiscal Review and audit in Co- lombia and implementation in Colombian companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it