MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205256460 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2021.3123899

Implementing Convolutional Neural Networks Using Hartley Stochastic Computing With Adaptive Rate Feature Map Compression

2021· article· en· W4205256460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesHuawei TechnologiesMcGill University
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkConvolution (computer science)AlgorithmFourier transformFast Fourier transformFilter (signal processing)Artificial neural networkMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption and the latency of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are two important factors that limit their applications specifically for embedded devices. Fourier-based frequency domain (FD) convolution is a promising low-cost alternative to conventional implementations in the spatial domain (SD) for CNNs. FD convolution performs its operation with point-wise multiplications. However, in CNNs, the overhead for the Fourier-based FD-convolution surpasses its computational saving for small filter sizes. In this work, we propose to implement convolutional layers in the FD using the Hartley transform (HT) instead of the Fourier transformation. We show that the HT can reduce the convolution delay and energy consumption even for small filters. With the HT of parameters, we replace convolution with point-wise multiplications. HT lets us compress input feature maps, in convolutional layers, before convolving them with filters. In this regard, we introduce two compression techniques: fixed-rate and adaptive-rate. In the fixed-rate compression, we select frequency domain input feature map (IFMap) coefficients with a constant pattern over all convolutional layers. However, for the adaptive-rate IFMap compression, the network, itself, learns to keep or discard coefficients, during training. Also, to optimize the hardware implementation of our methods (fixed- and adaptive-rate compressions), we utilize stochastic computing (SC) to perform the point-wise multiplications in the FD. In this regard, we re-formalize the HT to better match with SC. We show that, compared to conventional Fourier-based convolution, Hartley SC-based convolution can achieve <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.33\times$ </tex-math></inline-formula> speedup, and energy is reduced by 23% on a Virtex 7 FPGA when we implement AlexNet over CIFAR-10 based on the fixed-rate compression. Also, we show that if we utilize the adaptive-rate compression, we receive 16% and 15% latency improvement and energy consumption reduction, respectively, compared to the fixed-rate method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it