MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205289616 · doi:10.1353/wlt.2020.0005

Salman RushdieQuichotte

2020· article· en· W4205289616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Literature Today · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeniusNothingQuarter (Canadian coin)Theme (computing)LiteratureAlleyCivilizationCharacter (mathematics)HistoryArtArt historyVisual artsPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the other hand, “The Storm” is a text steeped in the fantastical. An ominous line opens the story—“It all happened when the sun was high in the sky”—before describing a storm that descended on the alley and its residents. It is like nothing the quarter has seen before, and by the time it blows over, many of the residents have been robbed of their belongings. Despair settles over the alley and its recurring characters as they await the start of a new day. Beyond the eighteen texts included in The Quarter, publisher Saqi Books also included scanned versions of the original Arabic texts as well as Mahfouz’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech from 1988. While the former was placed in the book to alleviate doubts as to the authenticity of the work, the latter was included as a reminder of Mahfouz’s character—the “son of two civilizations,” the Pharaonic civilization and the Islamic one. It is through this modest and deeply empathetic speech that readers gain further understanding of the man now considered the godfather of the modern Arabic novel. While The Quarter does not contain the sophisticated characters or detailed landscapes that characterize Mahfouz’s realist phase in the 1940s and 1950s, and certainly does not represent the best of the Nobel laureate’s creative talents, it still contains glimpses of the master’s genius. Despite the range of ideas presented in the collection , the stories remain interconnected, weaving a thematic web of ideas that start to resemble the narrow roads within the alleyways of the quarter itself. In this world where many characters are unnamed, where time is displaced, and where logic plays second fiddle to the absurd, it is the quarter that emerges to take center stage as the story’s protagonist. The Quarter is a worthy tribute to the experimentalism that Mahfouz undertook in Arabic literature and a recommended read for those who want to understand how the Arab world’s most celebrated novelist earned the title “The Master.” Be warned, however: this is not a book for those committed to Western genre conventions or for those who believe that the rules of traditional English-language literature are not to be broken. This is a book that insists that our modes of writing are endless, even if the scope of the stories is limited—one final reminder that in order to fully appreciate Mahfouz, you must free yourself from the shackles of traditional Western writing. Karim Zidan is an Egyptian-Canadian journalist, creative writer, and translator with bylines in the Guardian, Foreign Policy, and VOX Media, among others. Salman Rushdie Quichotte New York. Penguin Random House. 2019. 416 pages. SALMAN RUSHDIE, the much-celebrated as well as vilified Indian-born British author of the novels Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses, among others, has come up with a firecracker of a new novel. Not one to pull a punch, Rushdie’s latest novel, Quichotte, foregrounds the ideals of ubiquitous love and tolerance in a world that is consistently veering toward hatred, exclusion, and intolerance. Against the backdrop of rising hostility among and within nations as well as individuals, Rushdie endeavors to find a fine balance between history and fiction through a reinterpretation of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote. But his work does not end there: he provides insights into the rotten state of contemporary times by remaining fully grounded in the past. The quest for a rather unrealistic love and left Naguib Mahfouz, a Nobel Prize winner, is widely considered the godfather of the modern Arabic novel. WORLDLIT.ORG 75 Books in Review an unflinching desire to believe in the power of love against all odds remain at the crux of the novel. Through the sprawling and deep love stories of Quichotte, Rushdie unveils the deteriorating postcolonial condition and posthumanist imaginations. Quichotte’s conviction that “love will find a way” shapes his entire being, and this rumination dominates his life in all aspects. The multifarious aspects of love and acceptance find an array of expressions in the novel. Fact and fiction are interspersed, and the reality of living in contemporary times is unleashed through real and fictional stories. Rushdie thus...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it