MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two Key-Frame State Marginalization for Computationally Efficient Visual Inertial Navigation

2021· article· en· W4205713395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 European Control Conference (ECC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersScience and Engineering Research Council
KeywordsKey (lock)Key frameFrame (networking)Computer scienceInertial frame of referenceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceInertial navigation systemState (computer science)Reference framePosition (finance)Inertial measurement unitReal-time computingAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we perform a detailed evaluation of two key-frame state marginalization for visual inertial navigation filters to show that the method is significantly more computationally efficient than generic visual inertial odometry (VIO) methods while being sufficiently accurate for micro aerial vehicle (MAV) navigation. For this purpose, we use the EuRoC MAV dataset [1] for comparing the drift of MSCKF-Generic [2], MSCKF-Mono [3], MSCKF-Two way [4], and Two key-frame [5] VIO filters. The error state formulation of the two key-frame based and multi key frame based VIO is presented, then the drift, accuracy, and execution time of each filter is compared. The results indicate close to 90% faster execution of two key-frame based VIO algorithm on all datasets compared while having less than 3% drift in position for the total distance traversed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it