MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205724510 · doi:10.1063/5.0075645

Theoretical and experimental analysis of pulse compression capability in non-linear magnetic transmission line

2022· article· en· W4205724510 on OpenAlexaff
MuhibUr Rahman, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRingingPulse compressionTransmission linePhysicsNonlinear systemMagnetic fieldElectric power transmissionDissipative systemComputational physicsAmplitudeFigure of meritOpticsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a theoretical and experimental analysis of nonlinear magnetic transmission lines and demonstrates the phenomenon and capability of a simultaneous rise and fall time compression. A theoretical approach is formulated in which a new version of the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation is developed utilizing the Gardner–Morikawa transformation, continuum limit approximation, Toda-lattice approximation, and Mei theory of Maxwellian circuits. The proposed theoretical foundation work is validated through experimental demonstration. The pulse generation in a nonlinear magnetic transmission line is then studied in detail, and the output pulse characteristics are explored under different magnetic field strengths and arbitrary magnetization directions. In particular, output waveforms are analyzed in terms of pulse amplitude, full width half maximum, detailed ringing level, and figure of merit. Magnetic losses that arise in the ferrite material are modeled. It is shown that these losses are responsible for originating dissipative effects, which in turn deteriorate pulse shaping and increase ringing level. The localized disturbance within ferrimagnetic materials is also studied, and its impact on the output waveforms is also discussed. This study can potentially open up a new and fruitful entry to explore magnetic materials and their impacts in the field of ultrafast electronics in parallel with nonlinear electrical transmission lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207