The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potentials to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background The impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on cortical neurons is currently hard to predict based on a priori biophysical and anatomical knowledge alone. This problem can hamper the reliability and reproducibility of protocols aimed at measuring electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to TMS. New Method We introduce and release a novel software tool to facilitate and standardize the acquisition of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). The tool, rt-TEP (real-time TEP), interfaces with different EEG amplifiers and offers a series of informative visualization modes to assess in real time the immediate impact of TMS on the underlying neuronal circuits. Results We show that rt-TEP can be used to abolish or minimize magnetic and muscle artifacts contaminating the post-stimulus period thus affording a clear visualization and quantification of the amplitude of the early (<50 ms) EEG response after averaging a limited number of trials. This real-time readout can then be used to adjust TMS parameters (e.g. site, orientation, intensity) and experimental settings (e.g. loudness and/or spectral features of the noise masking) to ultimately maximize direct cortical effects over the undesired sensory effects of the coil’s discharge. Comparison with Existing Methods The ensemble of real-time visualization modes of rt-TEP are not implemented in any current commercial software and provide a key readout to titrate TMS parameters beyond the a priori information provided by anatomical models. Conclusions Real-time optimization of stimulation parameters with rt-TEP can facilitate the acquisition of reliable TEPs with a high signal-to-noise ratio and improve the standardization and reproducibility of data collection across laboratories. Highlights rt-TEP provides an immediate EEG readout to assess the quality of TEPs in real time rt-TEP interfaces with most commercial EEG systems Informative, real time visualization allows maximising the cortical impact of TMS while minimizing artifacts rt-TEP facilitates the acquisition of reliable TEPs with a high signal-to-noise ratio
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".