Multimodal Biometric Person Authentication Using Face, Ear and Periocular Region Based on Convolution Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biometrics is an active area of research because of the increase in need for accurate person identification in numerous applications ranging from entertainment to security. Unimodal and multimodal are the well-known biometric methods. Unimodal biometrics uses one biometric modality of a person for person identification. The performance of an unimodal biometric system is degraded due to certain limitations such as: intra-class variations and nonuniversality. The person identification using more than one biometric modality of a person is multimodal biometrics. This method of identification has gained more interest due to resistance on spoof attacks and more recognition rate. Conventional methods of feature extraction have difficulty in engineering features that are liable to more variations such as illumination, pose and age variations. Feature extraction using convolution neural network (CNN) can overcome these difficulties because large dataset with robust variations can be used for training, where CNN can learn these variations. In this paper, we propose multimodal biometrics at feature level horizontal fusion using face, ear and periocular region biometric modalities and apply deep learning CNN for feature representation and also we propose face, ear and periocular region dataset that are robust to intra-class variations. The evaluation of the system is made by using proposed database. Accuracy, Precision, Recall and [Formula: see text] score are calculated to evaluate the performance of the system and had shown remarkable improvement over existing biometric system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".