DAVID H. NUTTING AND TWO OTTOMAN CITIES: DİYARBAKIR, BİTLİS (1854-1864)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to portray the sociological and urban conditions as well as the geographical features of the two Ottoman cities, Diyarbakır and Bitlis, through the eyes of American missionary physician David H. Nutting and his working conditions in the third quarter of the nineteenth century (1854-1860). This testimony, with its high level of education, watchful eyes and narratives is particularly noteworthy. Indeed, due to the missionary physician's medical knowledge and the needs of the society for this, he could meet people from quite different social classes and wrote down his observations in great detail. This study, first of all, endeavours to describe the process of Dr.Nutting and his family’s departure from America and their arrival in the Ottoman Empire briefly. Afterwards, the letters which he started to write in Diyarbakır are examined for certain themes aside from detailed transfers on medical science. These themes shaped by the relationships that he had with the Muslim and especially the Armenian community and its leaders, as a physician and protestant, the geographical and architectural features of the cities and their reflections on human health. Finally, it should be noted that his observations and thoughts about Bitlis are handled more limitedly, since he was in Bitlis for a much shorter time than in Diyarbakır.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it