MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206175482 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2003.0080

Common and Contested Ground: A Human and Environmental History of the Northwestern Plains by Theodore Binnema

2003· article· en· W4206175482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)Political scienceLawPower (physics)Common groundLaw and economicsSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ter,land, and fish; (5) thedoctrine of implied re peals,which indifferent understandings can limit or enable theUnited States government's power to abrogate treaties; (6) thedisclaimer clauses in stateenabling acts and constitutions, which could and, in the authors' view, should be applied to reclaim thefederalgovernment's role as the lone constitutional authority to deal with the tribes; and (7) thedoctrine of sovereignimmunity, which is recognized by state and federal governments but is imperfectlyrecognized in the Indian na tions. Each chapterexamines how the legaldoctrine at issue has evolved over time through the ac tions, interactions, and decisions of officials in differentbranches of federal and state govern ments and compares that to how the authors believe thedoctrine should have developed, ifthe people involvedhad stayedtruetoan understand ingof the inherent sovereigntyofAmerican In dian nations. History offers more than just ex amples ofdoctrinal failure; italso contains a few good examples of the right way to understand sovereigntyand tomake law and policy. Wilkins and Lomawaima ground their counter-under standingofdoctrinal issues in thehistorical nar rative, too, whenever they can. For example, they conclude that the historical record shows that legal ownership of the lands ofAmerica resided fullyin thehands of the Indian nations and did not pass upon "discovery" to European nations, despite doctrinal confusion to thecontrary. Uneven Ground would be an excellent start ingpoint foranyone interested in studying the historical development of the central doctrines of Indian law and policy or inunderstanding the elements of current controversies inAmerican Indian law and policy. The authors' advocacy of a particular view helps sharpen theanalysis.This istrue with thefollowing caveats,however. First, this isnot a book for serious scholars or experts inhistory or law; it isbetter geared toward in troducing undergraduates to the history of American Indian law and policy.Amore sophis ticated look at the subject can be found inbooks by Robert Williams (especially The American Indian in Western Legal Thought), Francis Paul Prucha, CharlesWilkinson, andWilcomb Wash burn and in the revisedHandbook on Federal Indian Law. Second, the strengthof thebook? its strong advocacy of a particular perspective on how an understanding of sovereigntyshould lead to conclusions about various issues? is also a weakness when the complexities of the concepts and history are glossed over to serve the conclusions. Common and Contested Ground: A Human and Environmental History of the Northwestern Plains By Theodore Binnema University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 2001. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. 279 pages. $29.95 cloth. Reviewed by Ken Coates University ofSaskatchewan, Saskatoon THEODORE BlNNEMA SET OUT tOWritea comprehensive history of the northwest ern plains, focusing on human interactions and the interplayofhuman and natural phenomena in the region from200A.D. to 1806.The portrait he draws variesdramaticallyfrom theratherstaid image of a vast, thinlypopulated land inhabited by a small number of American Indian groups, 282 OHQ vol. 104, NO. 2 influenced by a handful of European explorers and traders,and dominated bymassive herds of buffalo. Binnema argues that the biological wealth of the region, particularly the buffalo herds, attracted Aboriginal peoples, sparked con flict over resources, and encouraged trade between American Indian groups and between Indians and newcomers. The result, he suggests, was a com plex, interwoven social environmentmarked by indigenous innovation, biological change, and intricatesocial, economic, and political relation ships. Binnema has provided a rich and nuanced examination of theregion.His central argument is thatnewcomers were not thedefining feature of life on thenorthwesternplains inthisera. While some Europeans had important relationships with some of theAmerican Indian peoples in the region,Binnema argues that"we cannot hope to understand Indian-Euroamerican relations ad equatelyunlesswe attempt toexplain them inthe context of broader Indian interactions. Any middle ground between indigenous peoples and newcomers developed within the common and contested ground" (p. 9).He challenges thestan dard historical interpretationsby emphasizing interethnic relations more than the standard Indian-newcomer interactionand by drawing on archaeological, anthropological, and ethno graphic literature toproduce a nicelydrawn analy sisof early indigenous cultures in the region.He does a particularly effectivejob ofdocumenting and explaining thecomplexitiesof interethnic and intraethnicrelations, managing in theprocess to examine both broad socioeconomic and cultural trendsand the specific impactof individuals and pivotal events. The book unfolds in a generally thematic fashion.The firsttwo chapters assess thenature of early indigenous lifein theregion,drawing...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it