Minimizing Age of Information in Multiaccess-Edge-Computing-Assisted IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) applications, such as augmented/virtual reality, tactile Internet, immersive gaming, etc., are currently experiencing an unprecedented growth in their demand. IoT devices are constrained by limited computation and power features and might experience excessive computational latency to support resource-intensive tasks. Multiaccess edge computing (MEC) appears to be a promising solution in this regard to expedite the computations of resource-intensive tasks by offloading them to the edge of the network. This article considers a scenario where a base station (BS) serves traffic streams from multiple IoT devices. The packets from each stream arrive at the BS (following a stochastic process) and then forwarded to their respective destinations after they are processed by the MEC node. The scheduling decisions are aimed to keep the information fresh at the destination. The information freshness is captured by Age of Information (AoI) metric. We aim to minimize the expected sum AoI for the MEC-assisted IoT network and provide mathematically traceable expressions for the AoI. First, an optimization problem is formulated to find the optimal scheduling policy in order to minimize the expected sum AoI. The optimization problem is an integer linear programming (LP) problem, which is generally difficult to solve. Hence, we provide a simpler formulation of the problem and derive a more traceable expression for the expected sum AoI. With this approach, the joint impact of stochastic arrivals, scheduling policy, and unreliable channel conditions on the AoI is assessed. We also propose low-complexity algorithms to obtain results for larger networks. Finally, through extensive simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed methods as compared to other existing strategies in terms of achievable AoI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".