MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206616548 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2021.3137461

Real-Time Estimation of Backlash Size in Automotive Drivetrains

2022· article· en· W4206616548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMichigan Technological UniversityFord Motor Company
KeywordsBacklashDrivetrainTorqueComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Automotive industryControl theory (sociology)EstimatorAutomotive engineeringActuatorEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of backlash in automotive drivetrains causes the so-called clunk (a.k.a. shunt) phenomenon during reversals in the sign of the actuator torque. This clunk manifests as an audible noise when the gears make contact at the end of the lash traversal, and thus, affects the drive comfort of the vehicle. To mitigate the clunk, automotive OEMs employ a variety of actuator torque shaping strategies, which require knowledge of the size of the backlash in order to be effective. Furthermore, since the size of the drivetrain backlash is expected to vary significantly over the lifetime of the vehicle and/or from vehicle-to-vehicle (due to manufacturing variations), there is a requirement to estimate the backlash size in real-time so as to maintain the effectiveness of these strategies. To this end, the current work develops an innovative Kalman filter-based lash size estimator that uses readily available speed and torque signals from the vehicle CAN bus. As part of the development, we evaluate the efficacy of the proposed estimator using both simulations and test vehicle data. The evaluation also includes a study of the robustness of the estimator to variations in the actuator torque trajectory and the calculated road load torque, presence of CAN jitter in the measured speed signals, and variations in backlash size, driveshaft compliance, and tire-road interaction. Furthermore, we analyze the computational feasibility of the estimator using processor-in-loop simulations in a dSPACE prototype controller. Both the performance and robustness studies prove the effectiveness of the proposed backlash size estimation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it