RPV-SLAM: Range-augmented Panoramic Visual SLAM for Mobile Mapping System with Panoramic Camera and Tilted LiDAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A LiDAR-assisted panoramic visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system for a mobile mapping system (MMS) is presented in this paper. The feasibility research on the SLAM for MMS with a panoramic camera and a tilted LiDAR without GPS/IMU sparked our interest. Because of the significant disparity in spatial sensing coverage, we show that employing a panoramic camera as a primary sensor for SLAM is more suitable than using a tilted LiDAR in this particular sensor combination. Existing panoramic visual SLAM systems, on the other hand, produce up-to-scale results, making them inappropriate for many applications that require metrically-scaled results. We develop a panoramic visual SLAM system that uses LiDAR points to generate metrically-scaled outputs to address this constraint. First, the suggested SLAM system augments visual features with ranges generated from LiDAR points. Following that, the visual features are fed into the SLAM pipeline, which performs tracking, local mapping, and loop closing. Finally, the scale information in the ranges augmented to visual features is integrated into the SLAM pipeline via the production of metrically-scaled map points, eventually leading to metrically-scaled SLAM results. Extensive testing in challenging outdoor conditions has proven the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed SLAM system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".