Efficient Resource Allocation for Multi-Beam Satellite-Terrestrial Vehicular Networks: A Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Method With Attention Mechanism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of intelligent transportation systems, there is an increasing demand for a variety of vehicular services, such as automated driving assistance, emergency alert, infotainment, etc. However, in some situations (e.g., remote areas or maritime scenarios), the terrestrial networks alone cannot serve the vehicular applications very well due to the infrastructure deployment and maintenance issues. Satellite networks have become an effective supplement to terrestrial networks, which complement well in terms of coverage, flexibility, reliability, and availability. In this paper, we consider the low orbit multi-beam satellite-terrestrial networks to serve for vehicles. We model this problem as a cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning process, where each beam acts as an agent, and the global bandwidth is cooperatively shared among all the agents. A multi-agent actor-critic method with attention mechanism is proposed to allocate resources for vehicles with strict delay requirements and minimum bandwidth consumption. When allocating bandwidth, the channel efficiency, the angle of the beams and the priorities of requests in different regions are also considered. Centralized training and distributed execution is performed in the training of the agents. Extensive simulation results verify the effectiveness of our proposed method, where all the agents can well cooperative to achieve efficient resource allocation on-demand for the vehicles under strictly limited bandwidth resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it