MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decision Support for Infection Outbreak Analysis: the case of the Diamond Princess cruise ship

2021· article· en· W4206906453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCruiseBayesian networkDecision support systemOutbreakComputer scienceDamagesOperations researchProbabilistic logicFocus (optics)PandemicComputer securityRisk analysis (engineering)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceInfectious disease (medical specialty)BusinessDiseaseMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on designing a CI decision support to address rare events such as disease outbreaks in a ‘closed’ environment such as a cruise ship. We focus on a case study of the COVID-19 outbreak that happened on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship in 2020. It considers a graphical probabilistic model such as Bayesian Network. We consider this causal model to be a core of an intelligent decision support tool to help in emergency management. To prove this hypothesis, the prototype of a decision support tool was implemented and used to evaluate different scenarios. The results show that such system equipped with a reasoning engine is capable of evaluating the pandemic scenario risks, thus helping assess the impacts of certain preventive measures, and damages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it