Synthesis of multi-alkylpolyamines and their performance as flow improver in crude oil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, three multi-alkyl polyamines, i.e., pentahexadecyl diethylenetriamine (PHDETA), hexahexadecyl triethylenetetramine (HHTETA) and heptahexadecyl tetraethylenepentylamine (HHTEPA), were synthesized and evaluated as pure flow improvers for crude oil. Under certain conditions, PHDETA, HHTETA and HHTEPA were able to improve the flow properties of L401 crude oil samples by reducing the viscosity of the crude oil by 97.5%, 94.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The three synthesized alkyl polyamines PHDETA, HHTETA and HHTEPA were able to reduce the viscosity of L1316 crude oil to a maximum of 94.3%, 93.7% and 94.9%, respectively. The pour point of L401 crude oil could be greatly reduced by 3.1 °C, 3.3 °C and 3.4 °C with PHDETA, HHTETA and HHTEPA, respectively. The pour point of L1316 crude oil with PHDETA, HHTETA and HHTEPA was strongly decreased by 2.8 °C, 2.9 °C and 3.2 °C, respectively. Photomicrographs showed the co-crystallization of L401 and L1316 crude oil in the presence of PHDETA, resulting in the formation of a non-close-packed network of wax crystals. The multi-alkyl polyamines have multiple alkyl side chains that extend in different directions into the oil phase and can co-crystallize with the wax molecules, allowing the wax crystals to disperse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it