MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FORMATION OF THE HUMAN CAPITAL OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES: CANADIAN EXPERIENCE

2021· article· en· W4207083159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Review Theory and Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman capitalFlexibility (engineering)BusinessAgricultureCreativityCompetition (biology)Affect (linguistics)Capital (architecture)Work (physics)MarketingIndustrial organizationEconomic systemManagementEconomicsMarket economySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the results of theoretical and empirical research on what kind of institutional and technological changes modern cooperative organizations are experiencing and how the transformations taking place at the level of cooperatives affect the qualitative characteristics of their human capital. Firstly, the paper analyzes the most significant aspects that affect the human capital of agricultural cooperatives, such as the organizational model in which they operate, the principles on which their activities are based as a whole. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that the business orientation of modern cooperatives and its (to a certain extent) entrepreneurial (and not purely traditional) structure from the point of view of ownership, management, financing determine new requirements not only for the members of the cooperative (farmers), but also (perhaps to a greater extent) for managers, narrow specialists, employees. Secondly, the factors contributing to the intensification of competition in agricultural markets are considered, in particular, it is proved that new requirements for agricultural products from its consumers determine new strategies of cooperative behavior, and consequently, a new "personnel architecture" of cooperative organizations, in which such qualities of human capital as high qualification, professional flexibility, creativity, responsibility for results, leadership, and the ability to work as a team come to the fore. Thirdly, based on the generalization of the results of scrupulous research of domestic and Western scientists on human capital management, the practical experience of Canadian agricultural cooperatives (using the example of the modern Canadian cooperative "Agropur"), their problems are revealed (including those that are determined by modern challenges and threats associated with the coronavirus pandemic, unfavorable climatic conditions, political sanctions), the approaches to the successful development of agricultural cooperation through the formation of relevant human capital are determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it