MMSUM Digital Twins: A Multi-view Multi-modality Summarization Framework for Sporting Events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sporting events generate a massive amount of traffic on social media with live moment-to-moment accounts as any given situation unfolds. The generated data are intensified by fans feelings, reactions, and subjective opinions towards what happens during the event, all of which are based on their individual points of view. Analyzing and summarizing this data will generate a comprehensive overview of the event in terms of how the event evolves and how fans react and view the event based on their perspectives. Previously, most of the summarization works ignore fan reactions and subjective opinions, and focus primarily on generating an objective-view summary. We believe that an effective and useful summary should consider human reactions, sentiment, and point of view, as opposed to simply describing what happens during the event. Accordingly, in this work, we propose MMSUM Digital Twins: a summarization framework that is capable of generating a multi-view multi-modal summary for sporting events in real-time. The proposed digital twins-based framework consists of four main components: sub-event recognition which detects the event’s key moments, tweet categorization, which determines which team the tweets’ writers support and assigns tweets to their teams, sentiment analysis to track fans’ state of mind, and image popularity prediction for selecting representative images. Furthermore, the MMSUM employs a visual-filtering model to address the issue of noisy images that inundate social media, compromising the summarization quality. We leverage the knowledge of sport fans to evaluate the generated multi-view summarization through an online user study. The experiment results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed approach for summarizing sporting events by considering multimedia data, sentiment, and subjective views of the event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".