Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The silage process consists of preserving green forage. However, errors in operations during harvesting, or even at the opening of the silo, can result in colonization of fungi and production of mycotoxins. Therefore, it is important to develop strategies to mitigate the negative effects of mycotoxins in the feeding of dairy cows. The objective was to review the literature on the contamination of silage by mycotoxins, including predisposing factors for contamination and ways of prevention and mitigation. The main environmental conditions that favor mycotoxin synthesis are temperature, pH and water activity. In addition, factors linked to the operation, such as delayed harvesting, delays in sealing the silo, the density of compaction or the use of damaged seals also favor fungal growth. The control of these processes in silage aims to avoid contamination by toxinogenic fungi. However, current control strategies are not entirely effective. Some safe and relatively economical measures are the use of mycotoxin adsorbents or bacterial inoculants, which can be used to reduce the absorption of mycotoxins in the gastrointestinal tract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it