Dual-User Haptic Teleoperation of Complementary Motions of a Redundant Wheeled Mobile Manipulator Considering Task Priority
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing applications of wheeled mobile manipulators (WMMs), consisting of a mobile platform (MP) and a manipulator, in diverse fields, new challenges have arisen in achieving multiple tasks such as obstacle avoidance in a constrained environment during the end-effector (EE) operation. A WMM is usually redundant due to the combination of the MP and the manipulator, making multitask control possible via employing its null space. Dual-user/two-handed teleoperation of a WMM is desirable for tasks where it is important to simultaneously control the poses of both the MP and the EE. The existing teleoperation approaches for WMMs are mostly executed at the kinematic level, without considering the nonlinear rigid-body dynamics of the WMMs. In this article, a task-priority-based dual-user teleoperation framework for a WMM is implemented to perform tasks in a constrained environment. It can simultaneously manipulate the MP and the EE, the overground obstacles are avoided by telecontrolling the MP using the WMM’s null space. Any residual redundancy can be further employed for other tasks such as singularity avoidance. The stability of the entire teleoperation design is rigorously proved even with arbitrary time delays. Experiments with a dual-user teleoperation system, consisting of two local robots and an omnidirectional WMM, are conducted to verify the proposed approach’s feasibility and effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it