TASR: Adversarial learning of topic-agnostic stylometric representations for informed crisis response through social media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of crisis events can be devastating in a multitude of ways, many of which are unpredictable due to the suddenness in which they occur. The evolution of social media (for example Twitter) has given directly affected individuals or those with valuable information a platform to effectively share their stories to the masses. As a result, these platforms have become vast repositories of helpful information for emergency organizations. However, different crisis events often contain event-specific keywords, which results in the difficult extraction of useful information with a single model. In this paper, we put forward TASR, which stands for Topic-Agnostic Stylometric Representations, a novice deep learning architecture that uses stylometric and adversarial learning to remove topical bias to better manage the unknown surrounding unseen events. As an alternative to domain adaptive approaches requiring data from the unseen event, it reduces the work for those responding to the onset of a crisis. Overall, we conduct a comprehensive study of the situational properties of TASR, the benefits of its architecture including its topic-agnostic and explainable properties, and how it improves upon comparable models in past research. From two experiments, on average, TASR is able to outperform state-of-the-art methods such as transfer learning and domain adoption by 11% in AUC. The ablation study illustrates how different architecture choices of TASR impact the results and that TASR has been optimized for this task. Finally, we conduct a case study to show that explainable results from our model can be used to help guide human analysts through crisis information extraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".