MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210701556 · doi:10.5167/uzh-217309

Lack of Association of Group A Streptococcal Infections and Onset of Tics: European Multicenter Tics in Children Study

2022· article· en· W4210701556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTicsMedicineLogistic regressionConfidence intervalHazard ratioIncidence (geometry)Proportional hazards modelCohort studyPediatricsInternal medicineOdds ratioProspective cohort studyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between Group-A streptococcal (GAS) infections and tic incidence among unaffected children with a family history of chronic tic disorders (CTD).MethodsIn a prospective cohort study, children with no history for tics aged 3 to 10 years with a first-degree relative with CTD were recruited from the European Multicentre Tics in Children Study (EMTICS) across 16 European centres. Presence of GAS infection was assessed using throat swabs, serum Anti-streptolysin O titres (ASOT) and Anti-DNAse B (ADB) titres blinded to clinical status. GAS exposure was defined using four different definitions based on these parameters. Cox regression analyses with time-varying GAS exposure were conducted to examine the association of onset of tics and GAS exposure during follow-up. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cox regression and logistic regression analyses.ResultsA total of 260 children were recruited whilst one subject was found to have tic onsets before study entry and therefore was excluded. 61 children (23.6%) developed tics over an average follow-up period of 1 (SD 0.7) year. There was a strong association of sex and onset of tics, with girls having an approximately 60% lower risk of developing tics compared to boys (HR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7). However, there was no statistical evidence to suggest an association of any of the four GAS exposure definitions with tic onset (GAS exposure definition 1: HR=0.310, 95% CI: 0.037-2.590; definition 2: HR=0.561, 95% CI: 0.219-1.436; definition 3: HR=0.853, 95% CI: 0.466-1.561; definition 4: HR=0.725, 95% CI: 0.384-1.370).ConclusionThese results do not suggest an association of GAS exposure and development of tics.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that Group-A streptococcal exposure does not associate with the development of tics in children with first-degree relatives with chronic tic disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it