MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210859512 · doi:10.1145/3517131

Demystifying the Soft and Hardened Memory Systems of Modern FPGAs for Software Programmers through Microbenchmarking

2022· article· en· W4210859512 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemSoftwareReconfigurable computingOperating systemComputer architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both modern datacenter and embedded Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) provide great opportunities for high-performance and high-energy-efficiency computing. With the growing public availability of FPGAs from major cloud service providers such as AWS, Alibaba, and Nimbix, as well as uniform hardware accelerator development tools (such as Xilinx Vitis and Intel oneAPI) for software programmers, hardware and software developers can now easily access FPGA platforms. However, it is nontrivial to develop efficient FPGA accelerators, especially for software programmers who use high-level synthesis (HLS). The major goal of this article is to figure out how to efficiently access the memory system of modern datacenter and embedded FPGAs in HLS-based accelerator designs. This is especially important for memory-bound applications; for example, a naive accelerator design only utilizes less than 5% of the available off-chip memory bandwidth. To achieve our goal, we first identify a comprehensive set of factors that affect the memory bandwidth, including (1) the clock frequency of the accelerator design, (2) the number of concurrent memory access ports, (3) the data width of each port, (4) the maximum burst access length for each port, and (5) the size of consecutive data accesses. Then, we carefully design a set of HLS-based microbenchmarks to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the memory systems of datacenter FPGAs (Xilinx Alveo U200 and U280) and embedded FPGA (Xilinx ZCU104) when changing those affecting factors, and we provide insights into efficient memory access in HLS-based accelerator designs. Comparing between the typically used soft and hardened memory systems, respectively, found on datacenter and embedded FPGAs, we further summarize their unique features and discuss the effective approaches to leverage these systems. To demonstrate the usefulness of our insights, we also conduct two case studies to accelerate the widely used K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) algorithms on datacenter FPGAs with a soft (and thus more flexible) memory system. Compared to the baseline designs, optimized designs leveraging our insights achieve about \( 3.5\times \) and \( 8.5\times \) speedups for the KNN and SpMV accelerators. Our final optimized KNN and SpMV designs on a Xilinx Alveo U200 FPGA fully utilize its off-chip memory bandwidth, and achieve about \( 5.6\times \) and \( 3.4\times \) speedups over the 24-core CPU implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it