An Accurate and Privacy-Preserving Retrieval Scheme Over Outsourced Medical Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid advancement in medical imaging techniques, Content-Based (medical) Image Retrieval (CBIR), which can assist in disease diagnosis, has gained much attention in both academia and industry. However, due to patients’ sensitive information involved in medical images, privacy-preserving CBIR is a challenge worth exploiting. Though several privacy-preserving CBIR schemes have been put forth, they can only resist known-background attack (KBA), and do not suffice for protecting the image privacy in outsourced settings. In this article, aiming at the above challenge, we first design a novel Privacy-preserving Mahalanobis Distance Comparison (PMDC) method to improve the accuracy of medical images retrieval. Then, combined with the Mahalanobis distance based Fuzzy C-Means (FCM-M) algorithm, a scheme named TAMMIE is proposed to achieve accurate and privacy-preserving medical image retrieval over encrypted data. With TAMMIE, an image owner can securely outsource the images and indexes to a cloud server, and query users can request retrieval services from the cloud server while keeping their queries private. Detailed security analysis shows that our proposed schemes are secure under the attack stronger than KBA. Furthermore, thorough empirical experiments conducted on two real-world and one synthetic datasets also demonstrate the efficiency of TAMMIE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it