A gain‐tuning method for almost disturbance decoupling problems of nonlinear systems with zero dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a gain‐tuning method for almost disturbance decoupling problems of nonlinear systems with zero dynamics is developed. Firstly, a linear subsystem is formed by linearizing the nonlinear system. Then, a linear matrix inequality can be formed for the linear subsystem. After that, a linear state‐feedback controller can be obtained by solving the linear matrix inequality. A nonlinear state‐feedback controller can be obtained for the original nonlinear system by using backstepping design method. Another linear state‐feedback controller can be derived by linearizing the nonlinear state‐feedback controller. Finally, the backstepping gains can be solved by equating the two linear controllers. The detailed derivations of the method are provided. Some comparisons with the existing techniques are discussed. Moreover, the designed method is verified by simulations and some comparisons are made accordingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it