MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Vivo Animal Models of Cerebral Vasospasm: A Review

2000· review· en· W4210962255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubarachnoid hemorrhageMedicineVasospasmCerebral vasospasmSubarachnoid spaceCerebral arteriesMiddle cerebral arteryAnesthesiaCardiologyPathologyIschemiaCerebrospinal fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cerebral vasospasm is delayed-onset cerebral arterial narrowing in response to blood clots left in the subarachnoid space after spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Ideally, studies on the pathogenesis and treatment of cerebral vasospasm in humans should be conducted using human cerebral arteries. Because in vivo experiments using human vessels are not possible, and postmortem pathological examination of human arteries in vasospasm provides only a limited amount of information, a number of animal models of vasospasm have been developed. METHODS: The literature was searched to find all references to in vivo animal models of SAH and vasospasm. An online search of the medical database MEDLINE was initially performed using the key words “cerebral,” “vasospasm,” “subarachnoid,” “hemorrhage,” “animal,” and “model.” References were checked to determine the first description of each in vivo animal model. RESULTS: Fifty-seven models of SAH and vasospasm were identified. These models used one of three techniques to simulate SAH: 1) an artery was punctured allowing blood to escape and collect around the artery and its neighbors; 2) an artery was surgically exposed, and autologous blood obtained from another site was placed around the artery; or 3) blood from another site was injected into the subarachnoid space and was allowed to collect around arteries. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. The majority of animal models of SAH and vasospasm use intracranial arteries; however, extracranial arteries have also been used recently in vasospasm experiments. These studies seem easier and less costly to perform, but concerns exist regarding the physiological dissimilarity between systemic and cerebral arteries. CONCLUSION: The model of SAH and vasospasm used most frequently is the canine “two-hemorrhage” model, in which two injections of blood into the dog’s basal cistern performed 48 hours apart result in greater arterial vasoconstriction than that effected by a single injection of blood. On the basis of its ability to accurately predict what occurs in human SAH, the best model of vasospasm seems to be the primate model in which a blood clot is surgically placed around the large cerebral vessels at the base of the monkey’s brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it