MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model Predictive Control for Reliable Path Following with Application to the Autonomous Vehicle and Considering Different Vehicle Models

2021· article· en· W4211181123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlHeading (navigation)Control theory (sociology)MATLABComputer sciencePath (computing)DiscretizationReference modelVehicle dynamicsLimit (mathematics)Control (management)EngineeringMathematicsAutomotive engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a reliable path following approach based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) and using different vehicle models are developed to: 1) minimize the lateral distance between the vehicle and a reference path, 2) minimize the heading error of the vehicle, and 3) limit the rate of steering inputs to their saturation values and produce smooth motions. The proposed MPC is implemented in MATLAB/Simulink using CasADi block in which the associated Optimal Control Problem (OCP) is discretized using the direct multiple-shooting method. Results show that designed controllers pulled the system back to the predefined reference path, and tracking performances were satisfactory. The effect of changing the prediction horizon and road friction coefficient at low/high speeds is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207