MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211196378 · doi:10.1002/0470862106.ia098

Intercalation Chemistry

2005· other· en· W4211196378 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntercalation (chemistry)Ionic bondingChemistryMoleculeLattice energyIonChemical physicsLattice (music)SolventCrystallographyInorganic chemistryCrystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The term ‘intercalation’ refers to a process whereby a guest molecule or ion is inserted into a host lattice. The structure of the guest–host or intercalation compound is only slightly perturbed from the host structure and the reaction used to form the compound is reversible. In this chapter, the major classes of host lattice are classified by both dimensionality and electronic properties. In three‐dimensional systems, the sizes of the guest species are constrained by the dimensions of the host lattice. In lower dimensional systems, no such restriction exists and the strongly bonded layers or chains can adjust their separation freely to accommodate guest species of different sizes. With increasing guest size, the structural correlation between layers or chains is diminished and in the limiting case, complete separation of single layers or chains occurs in solution, resulting in the formation of colloidal dispersions. Insulating host lattices undergo reactions that involve ion exchange, acid–base chemistry, solvent exchange, and sorption of neutral molecules from the gas phase. The insulating hosts have a fixed concentration of ionic guests that remains unchanged throughout subsequent reactions. The conducting host lattices have the feature that the concentration of ionic guest species can be altered by oxidation or reduction of the host. The chemistry of most compounds involves reduction and cation intercalation with the major exceptions of graphite and some layered oxides, which can be both reductively intercalated with cations and oxidized with anion insertion. The present understanding of the mechanism of intercalation with particular emphasis on layered structures is reviewed. Reactions involve adsorption of guest species on host crystals, exchange or insertion at the host surface, the formation of intermediate stages in layered compounds, and transport within the host lattice. Macroscopic effects such as variations in crystal size, dislocations, stacking faults, and pore mouth blockage can strongly influence the reaction kinetics. The major classes of host lattices in each category and their chemical behavior are described. The insulating materials discussed include zeolites, clays, layered double hydroxides, acid phosphates, and layered oxides while graphite, C 60 , carbon nanotubes, transition metal chalcogenides, metal phosphorus trisulfides, metal oxyhalides, metal nitride halides, and metal oxides are the major examples of conducting hosts. In the case of metal oxides, examples of both reductive intercalation of lithium ions and oxidative intercalation of oxide ions are discussed. These two types of intercalation reactions are important for lithium batteries and high‐temperature superconductivity, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1500.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it