MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211256111 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12645

Neighboring edges: Interacting edge effects from linear disturbances in treed fens

2022· article· en· W4211256111 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Laureen F. I. Echiverri, S. Ellen Macdonald, Scott E. Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Vegetation Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionBorealUnderstoryPeatGeologyTree lineEcologyBiologyPaleontologyCanopyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Questions Edge influence on forest biodiversity is an important environmental effect associated with habitat fragmentation, but extrapolating the influence of edges across the broader landscape has been difficult, especially for situations where multiple edges exist in close proximity. We asked whether there were differences in edge effects between two types (3 m vs 8 m width) of low‐severity linear disturbance (seismic lines) and whether there were interactions of edge effects when seismic lines occur in dense networks; that is, do multiple narrow seismic lines have a stronger or weaker edge influence than a single narrow seismic line. Location Treed peatlands in northeastern Alberta, Canada. Methods Seismic lines are created during oil and gas exploration and are responsible for dissection of boreal forests in western Canada. We sampled vascular plants along transects perpendicular to seismic lines in moderate‐rich and poor treed fens. We used the “Randomization Test of Edge Influence” (RTEI) to calculate the magnitude and distance of edge effects and then compared these between narrower (3 m) versus wider (8 m) lines and between single narrow lines versus multiple narrow lines (parallel and ~50 m apart). Results In moderate‐rich fens, we found a positive edge influence on understorey diversity from both wide and narrow seismic lines. We also found a weakening edge interaction on diversity, that is, single narrow seismic lines had a stronger edge influence on diversity than did multiple narrow seismic lines. In treed poor fens, multiple narrow seismic lines had a negative edge effect on tree density, understorey abundance, richness, and composition. In addition, we found strengthening edge interactions in treed poor fens on tree density, graminoid cover, and understorey composition. Conclusions Even narrow linear disturbances, such as seismic lines, can have significant edge effects and these are exacerbated when lines occur in dense networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Vegetation ScienceSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207