MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Target Detection for RD Images of HFSWR Based on CNN-ELM Model

2021· article· en· W4212776501 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS 2021: San Diego – Porto · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsExtreme learning machineClutterConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDetectorInterference (communication)Pattern recognition (psychology)RadarCascadeFeature extractionComputer visionArtificial neural networkEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) can effectively detect ship targets. However, ship target signals are often affected by strong clutter and complex interference. In this paper, we propose an HFSWR target detection algorithm based on a two-stage cascade detector combined with a convolutional neural network-extreme learning machine (CNN-ELM) model. In the first stage, an extremum detector (ED) is used to obtain suspicious target regions (STRs) in the range-Doppler (RD) spectrum image. In the second stage, a CNN-ELM model is employed. The features of the STRs are learned by a lightweight convolutional neural network (LW-CNN) and fast classification is performed by an extreme learning machine (ELM). The experiments show that the proposed algorithm can achieve better performance in the measured RD image than the traditional detection algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it