Comparative genomic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with either bovine intramammary infections or human infections demonstrates the importance of restriction-modification systems in host adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a major etiological agent of clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis. The versatile and adaptative evolutionary strategies of this bacterium have challenged mastitis control and prevention globally, and the high incidence of S. aureus mastitis increases concerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and zoonosis. This study aims to describe the evolutionary relationship between bovine intramammary infection (IMI)-associated S. aureus and human pathogenic S. aureus and further elucidate the specific genetic composition that leads to the emergence of successful bovine IMI-associated S. aureus lineages. We performed a phylogenomic analysis of 187 S . aureus isolates that originated from either dairy cattle or humans. Our results revealed that bovine IMI-associated S. aureus isolates showed distinct clades compared to human-originated S. aureus isolates. From a pan-genome analysis, 2070 core genes were identified. Host-specific genes and clonal complex (CC)-specific genes were also identified in bovine S. aureus isolates, mostly located in mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Additionally, the genome sequences of three apparent human-adapted isolates (two from CC97 and one from CC8), isolated from bovine mastitis samples, may provide an snapshot of the genomic characteristics in early host spillover events. Virulence and AMR genes were not conserved among bovine IMI-associated S. aureus isolates. Restriction-modification (R-M) genes in bovine IMI-associated S. aureus demonstrated that the Type I R-M system was lineage-specific and Type II R-M system was sequence type (ST)-specific. The distribution of exclusive, virulence, and AMR genes were closely correlated with the presence of R-M systems in S. aureus , suggesting that R-M systems may contribute to shaping clonal diversification by providing a genetic barrier to the horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Our findings indicate that the CC or ST lineage-specific R-M systems may limit genetic exchange between bovine-adapted S. aureus isolates from different lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".