MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213131373 · doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01592-w

Diurnal variations in the stratosphere of the ultrahot giant exoplanet WASP-121b

2022· article· en· W4213131373 on OpenAlexafffund
T. M. Evans, David K. Sing, J. K. Barstow, Tiffany Kataria, Jayesh Goyal, Nikole K. Lewis, Jake Taylor, Nathan J. Mayne, Tansu Daylan, Hannah R. Wakeford, Mark S. Marley, Jessica Spake

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Astronomy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilLeverhulme TrustCanadian Space AgencyMax-Planck-GesellschaftUK Research and InnovationSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsStratosphereAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)Northern HemisphereExoplanetWater vaporAltitude (triangle)Environmental scienceAstrophysicsPhysicsPlanetMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The temperature profile of a planetary atmosphere is a key diagnostic of radiative and dynamical processes governing the absorption, redistribution, and emission of energy. Observations have revealed dayside stratospheres that either cool [1,2] or warm [3,4] with altitude for a small number of gas giant exoplanets, while others are consistent with constant temperatures [5,6,7,8]. Here we report spectroscopic phase curve measurements for the gas giant WASP-121b,[9] which constrain stratospheric temperatures throughout the diurnal cycle. Variations measured for a water vapor spectral feature reveal a temperature profile that transitions from warming with altitude on the dayside hemisphere to cooling with altitude on the nightside hemisphere. The data are well explained by models assuming chemical equilibrium, with water molecules thermally dissociating at low pressures on the dayside and recombining on the nightside [10,11]. Nightside temperatures are low enough for perovskite (CaTiO3) to condense, which could deplete titanium from the gas phase [12,13] and explain recent non-detections at the day-night terminator [14,15,16,17]. Nightside temperatures are also low enough for refractory species, such as magnesium, iron, and vanadium, to condense. Detections [16,17,18,19] of these metals at the day-night terminator suggest, however, that if they do form nightside clouds, cold trapping is not as effective at removing them from the upper atmosphere. Note: Numbered references have been entered into the "Manuscript Comment" box.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Astronomy→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→