MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213169133 · doi:10.1177/14680874221078264

Dynamic measurement with in-cycle process excitation of HCCI combustion: The key to handle complexity of data-driven control?

2022· article· en· W4213169133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engine Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)CombustionController (irrigation)Mean effective pressureStability (learning theory)Homogeneous charge compression ignitionCoupling (piping)Process (computing)Computer scienceIgnition systemAutomotive engineeringEngineeringInternal combustion engineMechanical engineeringCombustion chamberCompression ratioChemistryControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) is a low temperature combustion technique with a high potential for reducing emissions while simultaneously improving fuel consumption. However, the high sensitivity to changing boundary conditions and low combustion stability at the edges of the operating range has lead to implementation challenges. Additionally, cyclic coupling through internal exhaust gas recirculation causes cyclic variations of the process, resulting in incomplete combustion, or even misfiring. Thus, consecutive cycles must be decoupled to increase the process stability. To achieve an accurate description of the coupling effects on a cycle-to-cycle and an inner-cyclic timescale, a novel measurement methodology is presented to generate data with a high variance. For this purpose, an active process excitation is performed to capture all relevant interactions between operating and feedback variables to enable modeling of the coupling effects on both timescales. To demonstrate the potential of the methodology, the generated data is used to design multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) models for both cyclic and inner-cyclic timescales. Artificial neural networks are then utilized to address the highly nonlinear process by taking advantage of the large amount of training data. Inverse process models are then used to implement a pure cycle-to-cycle and a multiscale MIMO closed-loop controller. Compared to state-of-the-art rule-based control approaches, the process stability and its thermodynamic efficiency are significantly improved. For the multiscale MIMO controller, a reduction of the standard deviation of the indicated mean effective pressure and the combustion phasing of more than 65% is achieved. In particular, the additional inner-cyclic feedback loop achieves a remarkable reduction of the standard deviation of approximately 35% and a 1.2% higher indicated efficiency compared to the cycle-to-cycle MIMO controller. The dynamic measurement with active in-cycle process excitation has proven to be an enabler for data-driven MIMO control of HCCI on multiple timescales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it