Deep Learning Models for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using iEEG Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease characterized by a large electrical explosion that is excessive and uncontrolled, as defined by the world health organization. It is an anomaly that affects people of all ages. An electroencephalogram (EEG) of the brain activity is a widely known method designed as a reference dedicated to study epileptic seizures and to record the changes in brain electrical activity. Therefore, the prediction and early detection of epilepsy is necessary to provide timely preventive interventions that allow patients to be relieved from the harmful consequences of epileptic seizures. Despite decades of research, the prediction of these seizures with accuracy remains an unresolved problem. In this article, we have proposed five deep learning models on intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) datasets with the aim of automatically predicting epileptic seizures. The proposed models are based on the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, the fusion of the two CNNs (2-CNN), the fusion of the three CNNs (3-CNN), the fusion of the four CNNs (4-CNN), and transfer learning with ResNet50. The experimental results show that our proposed methods based on 3-CNN and 4-CNN gave the best values. They both achieve an accuracy value of 95%. Finally, our proposed methods are compared with previous studies, which confirm that seizure prediction performance was significantly improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it