MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213433549 · doi:10.1109/wsc52266.2021.9715520

Studying COVID-19 Spread Using a Geography Based Cellular Model

2021· article· en· W4213433549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellular automatonPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)Computer scienceEpidemic modelPopulationPublic healthGeographyDiseaseOperations researchArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of infectious disease models has become increasingly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. The forecasting of disease spread using mathematical models has become a common practice by public health authorities, assisting in the creation of policies to combat the spread of COVID-19. Common approaches to the modeling of infectious diseases include compartmental differential equations and Cellular Automata, both of which do not easily model the spatial dynamics of disease spread over unique geographical regions. A geography-based Cell-DEVS approach to modelling pandemics is presented. The compartmental model presented considers additional factors such as movement restriction effects, disease incubation, population disobedience to public health guidelines, and a dynamic fatality rate. The model offers deterministic predictions for any number of regions simultaneously and can be easily adapted to unique geographical areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.493
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it