MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214518471 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3155457

CRC-Based Correction of Multiple Errors Using an Optimized Lookup Table

2022· article· en· W4214518471 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vivien Boussard, Stéphane Coulombe, François‐Xavier Coudoux, Patrick Corlay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité Polytechnique Hauts-de-France
KeywordsNotationLookup tableSpeedupTable (database)Error detection and correctionArithmeticComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new approach to perform multiple error correction in wireless communications over error-prone networks. It is based on the cyclic redundancy check syndrome, using an optimized lookup table that avoids performing arithmetic operations. This method is able to achieve the same correction performance as the state-of-the-art approaches while significantly reducing the computational complexity. The table is designed to allow multiple bit error correction simply by navigating within it. Its size is constant when considering more than two errors, which represents a tremendous advantage over earlier lookup table-based approaches. Simulation results of a C implementation performed on a Raspberry Pi 4 show that the proposed method is able to process single and double error corrections of large payloads in 100ns and 642$\mu \text{s}$, respectively, while it would take 300$\mu \text{s}$and 1.5s, respectively, with the state-of-the-art CRC multiple error correction technique. This represents a speedup of nearly$3000\pmb {\times }$for single error and$2300\pmb {\times }$for double error correction, respectively. Compared to table-based approaches, the proposed method offers a speedup of nearly$1200\pmb {\times }$for single error and$2300\pmb {\times }$for double error correction under the same conditions. We also show that when multiple candidate error patterns are present, numerous errors can be corrected by adding a checksum cross-validation step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207