Some New Estimates on Coordinates of Left and Right Convex Interval-Valued Functions Based on Pseudo Order Relation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relevance of convex and non-convex functions in optimization research is well known. Due to the behavior of its definition, the idea of convexity also plays a major role in the subject of inequalities. The main concern of this paper is to establish new integral inequalities for newly defined left and right convex interval-valued function on coordinates through pseudo order relation and double integral. Some of the Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for the product of two left and right convex interval-valued functions on coordinates are also obtained. Moreover, Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér type inequalities are also derived for left and right convex interval-valued functions on coordinates. Some useful examples are also presented to prove the validity of this study. The proved results of this paper are generalizations of many known results, which are proved by Dragomir, Latif et al. and Zhao, and can be vied as applications of this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it